Item Filtering: Difference between revisions

m
→‎Info Codes: examples for how to refer to flawless/perfect gems
m (→‎Multi-layered Stats: Removed footnote for elemental ids. replaced it with in-line, color-coded numbers)
m (→‎Info Codes: examples for how to refer to flawless/perfect gems)
Line 590:
| FILTLVL || filter strictness level || 0 - 9 (Show All Items, up to 9 custom levels)
|}
Since '''GEM''' doesn't apply to unstacked Flawless/Perfect gems, individual item codes are needed when referring to them:
 
<code>ItemDisplay[(GEM=4 OR gzv OR glw OR glg OR glr OR glb OR gly OR skl)]: %NAME%{%NAME%}</code> <span style="color:gray;">''displays all flawless gems''</span>
 
<code>ItemDisplay[(GEM=5 OR gpv OR gpw OR gpg OR gpr OR gpb OR gpy OR skz)]: %NAME%{%NAME%}</code> <span style="color:gray;">''displays all perfect gems''</span>
 
There is currently a [[Bugs|bug]] with hiding stacked gems/runes - if the lootfilter attempts to hide them, they'll usually be loaded regardless and appear with an empty name.